Is the construction worth keeping?
Substrate, joinery, veneer, damage and previous coatings determine whether the asset is a serious restoration candidate.

Property-specific assessment
The same finish decision does not fit every hotel, club, office, public building or vessel. Start with the asset, the setting and one controlled proof point.
A disciplined decision
Substrate, joinery, veneer, damage and previous coatings determine whether the asset is a serious restoration candidate.
Access, room turns, events, cure time, removal and phasing matter as much as the finish itself.
Compare equivalent quality plus freight, receiving, removal, disposal and installation—not purchase price alone.
Projects we consider
Evaluate repeatable guest-room and public-area assets before committing an entire property to replacement.
Preserve the established character of member-facing spaces while assessing a controlled path to a refreshed finish.
Retain executive and client-facing furniture whose proportions, quality or fit are difficult to replace like for like.
Start with condition and construction when continuity, public value and original character matter.
Use one location or asset group to test whether a repeatable restoration standard makes sense across a portfolio.
Assess distinctive interior woodwork and furniture where replacement may disturb fit, character or surrounding finishes.
What photos can—and cannot—do
Clear photos and quantities can help identify likely candidates and obvious concerns. Final method, schedule and pricing may require measurements, coating tests, access review or a representative pilot.
Compare restoration and replacement costsStart with the representative asset
Share the property type, quantity range, decision window and clear photos of the item and its setting.